Introduction

For nearly 120 years — since the moment the South Fork Dam was pushed aside by the over-flowing Lake Conemaugh — people have looked for someone to blame. Usually that has boiled down to the members of the South Fork Hunting and Fishing Club. In 1889, however, the Flood was ruled a “natural disaster” or “act of God.” No one was held legally responsible for what happened.

If the Flood happened today, imagine the lawsuits that would be filed by thousands against everyone remotely connected!

Maybe it is human nature to look for causes and place blame. However, looking for someone to blame is not really the most useful way to think about a tragedy on the scale of the Johnstown Flood of 1889. After all, the dam had held for decades with only a few problems that did not cause much destruction. Why did it fail so colossally on May 31, 1889? Why was the Conemaugh Valley so vulnerable to flooding? What other factors contributed to the size and destructiveness of the Johnstown Flood?

These are the big questions students will investigate by digging into the evidence. To answer the big questions, however, students will need to ask and seek answers for a multitude of other questions that overlap geology, meteorology, engineering, communication and transportation technologies, as well as history, geography, and economics disciplines within the social studies:

• Why is Pennsylvania so prone to flooding (it is the most flood-prone state in the union!)? What makes floods so much more destructive in some areas than others? How can floods be managed to make them less destructive?
• What made Pennsylvania’s rainfall of spring 1889 hard to predict? How much rain fell?
• How did the South Fork Dam fail?
• Why wasn’t the dam inspected regularly? Why didn’t people act on their doubts about the dam’s safety?
• What happened to the warning system?
• What made the 1889 Flood so destructive compared to other floods in Johnstown’s history?
• What part did industries’ environmental practices (or lack of them) play in the severity of the Flood?
• How can we anticipate how man-made structures like dams, bridges, roads, grading and filling change the natural flow of rivers and streams?
• To what extent was the Johnstown Flood a “natural disaster” of “Act of God” ?

Why investigate these questions now? As the old saying goes, “Hindsight is 20/20”! Is it unfair for us to judge everything that went wrong in May 1889 from the comfort of the 21st century? It is unfair if we are judging just to find more people to blame. But looking back at the Great Flood of 1889 to learn rather than judge can teach us many important lessons for today about getting along with the environment, keeping ourselves safe, and having the courage to stand up to powerful people who might not have our best interests in mind.